Browsed by
Author: Jennifer Groot

LIABILITY OF AI SYSTEMS AND HISTORY

LIABILITY OF AI SYSTEMS AND HISTORY

Share List Liability of Artificial Intelligence Systems – or: In Search of Lost Time. AI causes accountability gaps, but there is not yet a methodological toolkit to close those gaps. What are the problems of the contemporary methods? A distinction is made between law as practice and law as science. Legal history is proposed as a source of inspiration for today’s legal problems of AI. The discussion is guided by an academic chapter called “Liability of artifical intelligence systems –…

Read More Read More

AI ACCOUNTABILITY AND LEGAL HISTORY

AI ACCOUNTABILITY AND LEGAL HISTORY

Share List Bridging the accountability gap of artificial intelligence – What can be learned from Roman law? AI creates new problems for the attribution of responsibility. The incumbent law is not yet ready to close those gaps of responsibility. The look back into Roman Law might be helpful to get an idea of how the past dealt with autonomous agents and liability. Especially, how the Romans integrated slaves as decision making agents in their business transactions, is worth getting deeper…

Read More Read More

AI, EPISTEMOLOGY AND LAW

AI, EPISTEMOLOGY AND LAW

Share List What can epistemology and moral philosophy teach law? This podcast asks on the most basic level, what the legal options are for giving AI legal status. This means a rigorous analysis of the relation between human and non-human decision makers. The podcast involves the question of consciousness, the meaning of legal personhood and a discussion of contractarian approaches. Only a good knowledge of these issues lays the fundament for legal reasoning of AI. This episode discusses the chapter “Human…

Read More Read More